<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SkaroffBlog &#187; Democrats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/tag/democrats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skaroff.com/blog</link>
	<description>coming at you intermittently from the City of Brotherly Love</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:43:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pennsylvania Assembly Passes Minimum Wage Hike</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/04/07/penna-assembly-passes-minimum-wage-hike/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/04/07/penna-assembly-passes-minimum-wage-hike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 22:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PapaSkaroff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/04/07/penna-assembly-passes-minimum-wage-hike/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s good news from Harrisburg: In a lopsided 146-50 vote, Pennsylvania&#8217;s State Assembly passed HB 257, the long-stalled raise in the minimum wage. A large number of Republicans joined the solid Democrats on Wednesday to increase annual pay for the state&#8217;s lowest-wage workers by $4,000. Hourly pay would bump up to $6.15 starting July1 this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s good news from Harrisburg:  In a lopsided 146-50 vote, Pennsylvania&#8217;s State Assembly passed <a href="http://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/BI/BT/2005/0/HB0257P3872.HTM" title="HOUSE BILL 257">HB 257,</a> the long-stalled raise in the minimum wage.  A large number of Republicans joined the solid Democrats on Wednesday to increase annual pay for the state&#8217;s lowest-wage workers by $4,000.  Hourly pay would bump up to $6.15 starting July1 this year, and to $7.25 a year later, lifting thousands of families above the poverty line.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not law yet, however.  The State Senate still has to pass the bill before Gov. Rendell, an announced supporter of the wage increase, gets to sign it.  Be sure to remind <a href="http://www.pasen.gov/" title="Pennsylvania Senate. 'Find members by...' block">your State Senator</a> to help pass HB 257 when it comes up for a vote soon.</p>
<p>When enacted, the new rates would make Pennsylvania the <a href="http://www.fiscalpolicy.org/FPISmallBusinessMinWage.pdf" title="States with Minimum Wages above the Federal level... pg 3(pdf)">20th state to set its minimum wage above the federal level.</a></p>
<p><em>Young burger-flipper exception:</em>  The bill as passed allows employers to pay newly hired teenagers a &#8220;training wage&#8221; of $5.15/hr for two months.  And to protect the integrity of this exception, it forbids employers from firing regular employees just to substitute them with low-paid trainees.</p>
<p>Several Republican members of the Appropriations Committe who had voted against the bill in committee, switched and voted in favor of it when it reached the Assembly floor.  Shades of the Kerry campaign: They voted against the minimum wage, before they voted for it!</p>
<p>Companion legislation, a bill to set future automatic COLAs (cost-of-living adjustments), didn&#8217;t make it out of committee.  Without COLAs, expect the struggle to re-emerge in several years as inflation nibbles away at the new wage rates.</p>
<p><strong>Other legislative news:</strong>  As he had publicly pledged, Gov. Rendell last month vetoed the anti-voter bill.  Under that law, passed with strong Republican backing, Pennsylvania voters could be turned away at the polls if they failed to bring proper identification.  It would have replaced the current system in which voters sign a registry and have their signature compared to an older version already on file.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/04/07/penna-assembly-passes-minimum-wage-hike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Stall Penna. Minimum Wage Increase Again, 4th Time in 4 Weeks</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/03/11/republicans-stall-penna-minimum-wage-increase-again-4th-time-in-4-weeks/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/03/11/republicans-stall-penna-minimum-wage-increase-again-4th-time-in-4-weeks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 16:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PapaSkaroff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/03/11/republicans-stall-penna-minimum-wage-increase-again-4th-time-in-4-weeks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just back from the legislature&#8217;s February-March break, Pennsylvania&#8217;s Assembly Appropriations Committee unanamously approved sending the minimum wage bill (H.B. 2021) to the full House for a final vote. Then, after the Committee adjourned, Chairman Brett Feese pulled it back, using a maneuver to reconsider the bill. It&#8217;s now four consecutive legislative weeks that Committee Republicans [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just back from the legislature&#8217;s February-March break, Pennsylvania&#8217;s Assembly Appropriations Committee unanamously approved sending the <a href="http://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/BI/BT/2005/0/HB2021P3480.HTM" title="House Bill 2021 - Minimum Wage">minimum wage bill (H.B. 2021)</a> to the full House for a final vote.  Then, after the Committee adjourned, Chairman Brett Feese pulled it back, using a maneuver to reconsider the bill.  It&#8217;s now four consecutive legislative weeks that Committee Republicans have blocked a vote to raise the current pitiful minimum wage.</p>
<p>The Bill, sponsored by a whopping 87 Assemblymen, would help pull low-wage workers above the federal poverty level, raising the hourly rate to $6.25 this year and $7.15 in 2007, with annual cost-of-living raises thereafter.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pahouse.com/pr/Cohen/202030806.htm" title="Cohen says Republicans are running out of options to keep workers in poverty -- 3-8-06">Rep. Mark Cohen,</a> a leading advocate of the bill and House Democratic Caucus Chairman, says he expects the Dems will make motions to bring the legislation up again next week.  He calls Feese&#8217;s actions &#8211;moving to reconsider the bill and then accepting his own motion, all done after the Committee had adjourned&#8211; &#8220;an unprecedented parliamentary trick.&#8221;</p>
<p>Take action:<br />
â€¢ Contact Brett Feese (717-787-5270 <a href="mailto:repfeese@pahousegop.com" title="Appropriations Chair Rep. Brett Feese -- email">email</a>), urging him to report the bill to the full Assembly for a final vote.<br />
â€¢ Contact <a href="http://www.legis.state.pa.us/" title="PA General Assembly -- Find Members by...">your own State Assemblyman</a> to enlist support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/03/11/republicans-stall-penna-minimum-wage-increase-again-4th-time-in-4-weeks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Unknown&#8217; Candidate Pennacchio Shows Strength</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/03/09/unknown-candidate-pennacchio-shows-strength/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/03/09/unknown-candidate-pennacchio-shows-strength/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 04:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PapaSkaroff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santorum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/03/09/unknown-candidate-pennacchio-shows-strength/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here comes Pennacchio: At its annual endorsement meeting Saturday in preparation for this spring&#8217;s primary election, the Bucks County Democratic Committee reflected a growing recognition of progressive U.S. Senate candidate Chuck Pennacchio. Pennacchio, a Bucks resident whose name has been unknown to most Pennsylvanians, garnered a surprising 47% of the vote, nearly edging out major [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Here comes Pennacchio:</em>  At its annual endorsement meeting Saturday in preparation for this spring&#8217;s primary election, the <a href="http://www.bucksdemocrats.com/displaynews.asp?id=42" title="Bucks County Dems - 2006 Endorsements">Bucks County Democratic Committee</a> reflected a growing recognition of progressive U.S. Senate candidate <a href="http://chuck2006.com/" title="Chuck Pennacchio for United States Senate 2006">Chuck Pennacchio.</a>  Pennacchio, a Bucks resident whose name has been unknown to most Pennsylvanians, garnered a surprising 47% of the vote, nearly edging out major player and conservative candidate Bob Casey Jr. with 52%.</p>
<p>The winner of the May 16 primary will face NeoCon Rick Santorum in the general election next November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/03/09/unknown-candidate-pennacchio-shows-strength/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rendell: I&#8217;ll veto anti-voter bill</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/21/rendell-ill-veto-anti-voter-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/21/rendell-ill-veto-anti-voter-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 15:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PapaSkaroff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/?p=301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congratulations to Gov. Ed Rendell for standing up to the Republican-dominated state legislature in their attempt to limit voters&#8217; rights! In a speech at the National Constitution Center, the Governor announced yesterday he would veto the bill passed by the state legislature that would make voting more cumbersome by requiring every voter to show an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations to Gov. Ed Rendell for standing up to the Republican-dominated state legislature in their attempt to limit voters&#8217; rights!  In a speech at the National Constitution Center, the Governor announced yesterday he would veto the bill passed by the state legislature that would make voting more cumbersome by requiring every voter to show an ID.</p>
<p>According to the <a href="http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/news/13919119.htm" title="Rendell to veto bill that would require voter ID">AP report,</a></p>
<blockquote><p>He believes such a mandate is unconstitutional and would disenfranchise some of the state&#8217;s most vulnerable residents.  People including nursing home residents and poorer citizens might not have proper ID and thus could lose their right to vote under the legislation, Rendell said.</p>
<p>&#8220;At a time in our nation&#8217;s history when voter participation is dropping to alarming levels, the government should not be taking action that will turn away bona fide voters from our polls.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>This from the <a href="http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/13920986.htm" title="IDs at polls unnecessary, Rendell says">Philadelphia Inquirer:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Seated in front of a dozen of the city&#8217;s African American leaders, Democrats all, Rendell said at a news conference that House Bill 1318 would have the effect of denying some people their right to vote.</p>
<p>The legislation, he said, would discourage voting at a time when &#8220;we should be doing everything we can to increase voter participation.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Meanwhile, Lynn Swann, Rendell&#8217;s likely Republican opponent next election, seems worried that without the new law not enough Democrats will be turned away from the polls.  &#8220;The idea that presenting a form of identification would somehow disenfranchise people is as ridiculous as it is untrue,&#8221; his campaign dissembled.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.governor.state.pa.us/governor/cwp/view.asp?a=3&#038;q=445630" title="Governor: HB 1318 Veto Letters">governor&#8217;s website</a> lists 22 organizations urging a veto of House Bill 1318.  <em>Still to come:</em>  Even though passed by the legislature last Wednesday, the bill has yet to cross the governor&#8217;s desk allowing his formal veto.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/21/rendell-ill-veto-anti-voter-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roadblocks at the Ballot Box:  Legislature Passes Pennsylvania Anti-Voting Rights Act</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/17/roadblocks-at-the-ballot-box-legislature-passes-pennsylvania-anti-voting-rights-act/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/17/roadblocks-at-the-ballot-box-legislature-passes-pennsylvania-anti-voting-rights-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PapaSkaroff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/17/roadblocks-at-the-ballot-box-legislature-passes-pennsylvania-anti-voting-rights-act/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember the first time you voted and had to show your ID? There&#8217;s new legislation requiring voters to remember to bring proper ID at every election. The state Senate and Assembly passed House Bill 1318 on party-line votesâ€“ with Republicans in favor of cracking down on teens who haven&#8217;t gotten drivers&#8217; licenses, little old ladies [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember the first time you voted and had to show your ID?  There&#8217;s new legislation requiring voters to remember to bring proper ID at <em>every </em>election. The state Senate and Assembly passed <a href="http://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/BI/BT/2005/0/HB1318P3587.HTM" title="H.B. 1318">House Bill 1318</a> on party-line votesâ€“ with Republicans in favor of cracking down on teens who haven&#8217;t gotten drivers&#8217; licenses, little old ladies with wallets left at home on their dressers, renters and low-income folks who don&#8217;t get utilities bills; and with Democrats willing to let just any ol&#8217; registered voter actually cast a ballot.</p>
<p>The legislation, if signed by Gov. Ed Rendell, will make for longer, slower lines at the polls.  Expect angry scenes as voters, accustomed to the current convenience of the matching-signature rule, get turned away due to the new technicalities.  Y&#8217;know, voting&#8217;s becoming too much of a hassle.  I&#8217;m gonna just stay home.  Tuesday nights &#8230; American Idol&#8217;s on at 8.</p>
<p>Or maybe I&#8217;ll tell the Governor that erecting barriers to voting is bad law, and he should veto H.B. 1318.  These two sites have lists of ways to contact him: <a href="http://www.governor.state.pa.us/governor/cwp/view.asp?a=1117&#038;q=437853&#038;governorNav=" title="Contact the Governor">first</a> and <a href="http://www.governor.state.pa.us/governor/cwp/view.asp?a=1109&#038;q=442340" title="Governor: Regional Offices">second</a>.</p>
<p>State Rep. Babette Josephs of Philadelphia is a vocal critic of the bill, for both the damage it will do as well as the needed electoral reforms is fails to address.  <a href="http://www.pahouse.com/pr/Josephs/182021506.htm" title="Josephs to governor: 'Veto H.B. 1318, the anti-voting rights act'">She says,</a>  </p>
<blockquote><p>I am working on real problems that have occurred in recent elections: unworkable statutory deadlines which led to military ballots being received too late to be counted; long lines at polling places; widespread intimidation of minority voters; coordinated efforts to mislead voters as to the date of the election or the location of polling places, and phony voter registration drives where registrations of one party were discarded.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/17/roadblocks-at-the-ballot-box-legislature-passes-pennsylvania-anti-voting-rights-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Penna. Republicans Block Vote to Raise State Minimum Wage&#8211; 3rd Time in a Month</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/15/pa-state-house-republicans-block-vote-to-raise-minimum-wage-3rd-time-in-a-month-2/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/15/pa-state-house-republicans-block-vote-to-raise-minimum-wage-3rd-time-in-a-month-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PapaSkaroff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/15/pa-state-house-republicans-block-vote-to-raise-minimum-wage-3rd-time-in-a-month-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a Valentine present to Pennsylvania&#8217;s low-wage employers, the Republican majority in the State Assembly yesterday voted for the third time in as many weeks to block a Democratic-backed bill to raise the minimum wage. The vote came just as the Assembly started its break for the rest of the month. The new rate, a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a Valentine present to Pennsylvania&#8217;s low-wage employers, the Republican majority in the State Assembly yesterday voted for the third time in as many weeks to block a Democratic-backed bill to raise the minimum wage.  The vote came just as the Assembly started its break for the rest of the month.</p>
<p>The new rate, a pitiful $7.15/hr, is a substantial hike from the current $5.15 and is in line with new rates in <a href="http://www.dol.gov/esa/minwage/america.htm" title="US Dept. of Labor - Minimum Wage by State">New York and New Jersey</a>.  Blocking the bill from consideration is a way for the Republicans to maintain the current wage rate without members actually going on record as voting against the hike.</p>
<p>Two House Republicans defected from their party by voting in favor of considering the bill.  In a message to supporters, Democratic House leaders Mike Veon and Mark Cohen say they see this move as a small but significant change; only ten more defectors will give the Dems the majority they need to finally bring the bill to an up-or-down vote.  A number of Republicans have quietly assured constituents that they support the wage hike.</p>
<p>What you can do to help:</p>
<p>â€¢ Call your Republican Assemblyperson and urge their support for the (barely) livable new wage rate.</p>
<p>â€¢ If you&#8217;re in a Democratic district, you can contact Republican <a href="mailto:repfeese@pahousegop.com" title="Rep. Brett Feese, PA Appropriations Committee Chair">Rep. Brett Feese,</a> chair of the Appropriations Committee, urging a floor vote.</p>
<p>Not sure who your Assemblyperson is?  Use the <a href="http://www.legis.state.pa.us/" title="Search for Your Assemblyman">&#8220;Find Members By&#8221; search block</a> at the Pennsylvania General Assembly  home page.</p>
<p>Rep. Mark Cohen, sponsor of the bill, is the son of recently deceased Philadelphia City Councilman-at-Large David Cohen, a long-time supporter of workers&#8217; issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/15/pa-state-house-republicans-block-vote-to-raise-minimum-wage-3rd-time-in-a-month-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Run for Office in Philly This Spring</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/01/27/run-for-office-in-philly-this-spring/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/01/27/run-for-office-in-philly-this-spring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 20:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PapaSkaroff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/01/27/run-for-office-in-philly-this-spring/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interested in local politics and community service? Are you ready to go beyond merely complaining about the system? A good place to start in Philadelphia is the position of Ward Committee Member&#8211; no experience is required, and there are almost 7,000 openings! Here&#8217;s how it works: The City has 66 Wards which are divided into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interested in local politics and community service?  Are you ready to go beyond merely complaining about the system?</p>
<p>A good place to start in Philadelphia is the position of Ward Committee Member&#8211; no experience is required, and there are almost 7,000 openings!</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how it works:  The City has 66 Wards which are divided into a total of 1681 <em>Divisions</em>&#8211; what are often called Precincts in other jurisdictions.  Your Division is your immediate neighborhood.  Each Division has just a single polling place (sometimes shared with neighboring Divisions), and the Democrats and Republicans can each have two Committee Members serving a few hundred voters registered in the party.</p>
<p>Committee Members actively support party causes and candidates for higher offices.  They&#8217;re the link between the neighborhood and the larger political world and have some say in selecting local party leadership.  Committee Members often help neighbors interact with City bureaucracies&#8211; it&#8217;s the essence of retail politics.</p>
<p>All Committee Members are chosen in the May Primary.  To run, you must be 18+ and registered in the party. You&#8217;ll need signatures of 10 supporters (call 215-686-3460 for forms), collected between Valentine&#8217;s Day and March 7.  Now&#8217;s the time to get moving.  Make a difference!</p>
<p>Other offices up for grabs this spring:  State Committee Member (100 signatures required) and State Assembly Representative (300).  Call 717-787-5280 for forms.</p>
<p>No vacancies?  Note that none of the current State Assemblymen from Philadelphia have said that they <em>won&#8217;t</em> be running again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/01/27/run-for-office-in-philly-this-spring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>But Aren&#8217;t Democrats Weak?</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/11/30/but-arent-democrats-weak/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/11/30/but-arent-democrats-weak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/11/30/but-arent-democrats-weak/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got this via email today and thought it was pretty interesting. We hate America, right? DEMOCRATS: * Al Gore: enlisted Aug. 1969; sent to Vietnam Jan. 1971 as an army journalist in 20th Engineer Brigade. * John Kerry: Lt., Navy 1966-70; Silver Star, Bronze Star with Combat V, Purple Hearts. * Walter Mondale: Army [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I got this via email today and thought it was pretty interesting.  We hate America, right?</em></p>
<p><strong>DEMOCRATS:</strong><br />
* Al Gore: enlisted Aug. 1969; sent to Vietnam Jan. 1971 as an army<br />
 journalist in 20th Engineer Brigade.<br />
* John Kerry: Lt., Navy 1966-70; Silver Star, Bronze Star with Combat V,<br />
Purple Hearts.<br />
* Walter Mondale: Army 1951-1953</p>
<p><strong>REPUBLICANS</strong> &#8212; and these are the guys SENDING PEOPLE TO WAR:<br />
* Dick Cheney: did not serve. Several deferments, the last by marriage.<br />
* Dennis Hastert: did not serve.<br />
* Tom Delay: did not serve.<br />
* Roy Blunt: did not serve.<br />
* Bill Frist: did not serve.</p>
<p>Complete list on the flip&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-268"></span></p>
<p>The complete list:</p>
<p><strong>DEMOCRATS:</strong></p>
<p>* Richard Gephardt: Air National Guard, 1965-71.</p>
<p>* David Bonior: Staff Sgt., Air Force 1968-72.</p>
<p>* Tom Daschle: 1st Lt., Air Force SAC 1969-72.</p>
<p>* Al Gore: enlisted Aug. 1969; sent to Vietnam Jan. 1971 as an army<br />
 journalist in 20th Engineer Brigade.</p>
<p>* Bob Kerrey: Lt. j.g. Navy 1966-69; Medal of Honor, Vietnam.</p>
<p>* Daniel Inouye: Army 1943-47; Medal of Honor, WWII.</p>
<p>* John Kerry: Lt., Navy 1966-70; Silver Star, Bronze Star with Combat V,<br />
Purple Hearts.</p>
<p>* Charles Rangel: Staff Sgt., Army 1948-52; Bronze Star, Korea.</p>
<p>* Max Cleland: Captain, Army 1965-68; Silver Star &#038; Bronze Star,<br />
Vietnam. Paraplegic from war injuries. Served in Congress.</p>
<p>* Ted Kennedy: Army, 1951-53.</p>
<p>* Tom Harkin: Lt., Navy, 1962-67; Naval Reserve, 1968-74.</p>
<p>* Jack Reed: Army Ranger, 1971-1979; Captain, Army Reserve 1979-91.</p>
<p>* Fritz Hollings: Army officer in WWII; Bronze Star and seven campaign<br />
ribbons.</p>
<p>* Leonard Boswell: Lt. Col., Army 1956-76; Vietnam, DFCs, Bronze<br />
Stars, and Soldier&#8217;s Medal.</p>
<p>* Pete Peterson: Air Force Captain, POW. Purple Heart, Silver Star and<br />
Legion of Merit.</p>
<p>* Mike Thompson: Staff sergeant, 173rd Airborne, Purple Heart.</p>
<p>* Bill McBride: Candidate for Fla. Governor. Marine in Vietnam; Bronze<br />
Star with Combat V.</p>
<p>* Gray Davis: Army Captain in Vietnam, Bronze Star.</p>
<p>* Pete Stark: Air Force 1955-57</p>
<p>* Chuck Robb: Vietnam</p>
<p>* Howell Heflin: Silver Star</p>
<p>* George McGovern: Silver Star &#038; DFC during WWII.</p>
<p>* Bill Clinton: Did not serve. Student deferments. Entered draft but<br />
received #311.</p>
<p>* Jimmy Carter: Seven years in the Navy.</p>
<p>* Walter Mondale: Army 1951-1953</p>
<p>* John Glenn: WWII and Korea; six DFCs and AirMedal with 18 Clusters.</p>
<p>* Tom Lantos: Served in Hungarian underground in WWII. Saved by Raoul<br />
Wallenberg.</p>
<p><strong>REPUBLICANS</strong> &#8212; and these are the guys SENDING PEOPLE TO WAR:</p>
<p>* Dick Cheney: did not serve. Several deferments, the last by marriage.</p>
<p>* Dennis Hastert: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Tom Delay: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Roy Blunt: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Bill Frist: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Mitch McConnell: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Rick Santorum: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Trent Lott: did not serve.</p>
<p>* John Ashcroft: did not serve. Seven deferments to teach business.</p>
<p>* Jeb Bush: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Karl Rove: did not serve. (Bush&#8217;s Machiavelli)</p>
<p>* Saxby Chambliss: did not serve. &#8220;Bad knee.&#8221; The man who attacked Max<br />
Cleland&#8217;s patriotism. (You know what should be done to him!)</p>
<p>* Paul Wolfowitz: did not serve. Neocon warhawk</p>
<p>* Vin Weber: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Richard Perle: did not serve. Neocon warhawk</p>
<p>* Douglas Feith: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Eliot Abrams: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Richard Shelby: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Jon Kyl (Senator, Arizona): did not serve.</p>
<p>* Tim Hutchison: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Christopher Cox: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Newt Gingrich: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Don Rumsfeld: served in Navy (1954-57) as flight instructor.</p>
<p>* George W. Bush: failed to complete his six-year National Guard; got<br />
assigned to Alabama so he could campaign for family friend running for<br />
U.S. Senate; failed to show up for required medical exam, disappeared from duty.</p>
<p>* Ronald Reagan: due to poor eyesight, served in a non- combat role<br />
making movies.</p>
<p>* B-1 Bob Dornan: Consciously enlisted after fighting was over in Korea.</p>
<p>* Phil Gramm: did not serve.</p>
<p>* John McCain: Vietnam POW, Silver Star, Bronze Star, Legion of Merit,<br />
Purple Heart and Distinguished Flying Cross. Remember how the Bush campaign trashed him in the Republican primaries in 2000?</p>
<p>* Dana Rohrabacher: did not serve.</p>
<p>* John M. McHugh: did not serve.</p>
<p>* JC Watts: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Jack Kemp: did not serve. &#8220;Knee problem, &#8221; although continued in NFL<br />
for 8 years as quarterback. (Win one for the Gipper!!)</p>
<p>* Dan Quayle: Journalism unit of the Indiana National Guard.</p>
<p>* Rudy Giuliani: did not serve.</p>
<p>* George Pataki: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Spencer Abraham: did not serve.</p>
<p>* John Engler: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Lindsey Graham: National Guard lawyer.</p>
<p>* Arnold Schwarzenegger: AWOL from Austrian army base. (Our gift from Austria)</p>
<p>Pundits &#038; Preachers</p>
<p>* Sean Hannity: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Rush Limbaugh: did not serve (4-F with a &#8216;pilonidal cyst.&#8217;)</p>
<p>* Bill O&#8217;Reilly: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Michael Savage: did not serve.</p>
<p>* George Will: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Chris Matthews: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Paul Gigot: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Bill Bennett: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Pat Buchanan: did not serve.</p>
<p>* John Wayne: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Bill Kristol: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Kenneth Starr: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Antonin Scalia: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Clarence Thomas: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Ralph Reed: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Michael Medved: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Charlie Daniels: did not serve.</p>
<p>* Ted Nugent: did not serve. (He only shoots at things that don&#8217;t shoot back.) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/11/30/but-arent-democrats-weak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh what a beautiful morning</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/11/09/oh-what-a-beautiful-morning/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/11/09/oh-what-a-beautiful-morning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2005]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/11/09/oh-what-a-beautiful-morning/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It sure is nice to wake up on a Wednesday morning in early November and have something to smile about. Last night was a good night to be a Democrat, and showed a clear repudiation by the public of Republicans and the bankrupt right wing conservative ideology. From New Jersey, Governor John Corzine. From Virginia, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sure is nice to wake up on a Wednesday morning in early November and have something to smile about.  Last night was a good night to be a Democrat, and showed a clear repudiation by the public of Republicans and the bankrupt right wing conservative ideology.</p>
<ul>
<li>From New Jersey, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/08/AR2005110802108.html" title="Corzine Defeats Forrester To Become N.J. Governor">Governor John Corzine</a>.</li>
<li>From Virginia, <a href="http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/08/AR2005110800371.html" title="Democrat Kaine Wins in Virginia">Governor Timothy Kaine</a>.</li>
<li>In California, <a href="http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/11/09/MNG6IFLAMF1.DTL" title="THE SPECIAL ELECTION CALIFORNIANS SAY NO TO SCHWARZENEGGER STATE MEASURES: Governor reaches out, doesn't concede">all four of Governor Schwarzenegger&#8217;s special election ballot initiatives fail</a>.</li>
<li>ALL eight Republican school board members in Dover, PA who supported the teaching of &#8216;intelligent design&#8217; are <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/09/national/09dover.html" title="Evolution Slate Outpolls Rivals">booted out and replaced by Democrats</a>.</li>
<li>Also state legislature pickups, the failure of an anti-gay ballot iniative in Maine, and the defeat of a Bush-endorsing Dem in the St. Paul, MN mayoral primary.  Go to <a href="http://www.dailykos.com" title="Daily Kos">Kos</a> and <a href="http://www.mydd.com" title="My Due Diligence">MyDD</a> for more coverage.</li>
</ul>
<p>Mighty fine indeed. Let&#8217;s get ready for 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/11/09/oh-what-a-beautiful-morning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Give &#8216;em hell Harry</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/11/01/give-em-hell-harry/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/11/01/give-em-hell-harry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2006]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/?p=247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today Democratic Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid fired the first salvo in the nationalization of the 2006 election and began the long struggle to bring accountability and competence back to the White House and the Congress. He delivered this speech on the Senate floor: &#8220;This past weekend, we witnessed the indictment of I. Lewis Libby, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today Democratic Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid fired the first salvo in the nationalization of the 2006 election and began the long struggle to bring accountability and competence back to the White House and the Congress.  He delivered <a href="http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/11/1/144647/999" title="Sen. Reid Demands an Investigation">this speech</a> on the Senate floor:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;This past weekend, we witnessed the indictment of I. Lewis Libby, the Vice President&#8217;s Chief of Staff and a senior Advisor to President Bush.  Libby is the first sitting White House staffer to be indicted in 135 years. </p>
<p>&#8220;This indictment raises very serious charges.  It asserts this Administration engaged in actions that both harmed our national security and are morally repugnant. </p>
<p>&#8220;The decision to place U.S. soldiers in harm&#8217;s way is the most significant responsibility the Constitution invests in the Congress. </p>
<p>&#8220;The Libby indictment provides a window into what this is really about:  how the Administration manufactured and manipulated intelligence in order to sell the war in Iraq and attempted to destroy those who dared to challenge its actions.</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-247"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;As a result of its improper conduct, a cloud now hangs over this Administration.  This cloud is further darkened by the Administration&#8217;s mistakes in prisoner abuse scandal, Hurricane Katrina, and the cronyism and corruption in numerous agencies.</p>
<p>&#8220;And, unfortunately, it must be said that a cloud also hangs over this Republican-controlled Congress for its unwillingness to hold this Republican Administration accountable for its misdeeds on all of these issues.</p>
<p>&#8220;Let&#8217;s take a look back at how we got here with respect to Iraq Mr. President.  The record will show that within hours of the terrorist attacks on 9/11, senior officials in this Administration recognized these attacks could be used as a pretext to invade Iraq. </p>
<p>&#8220;The record will also show that in the months and years after 9/11, the Administration engaged in a pattern of manipulation of the facts and retribution against anyone who got in its way as it made the case for attacking Iraq.</p>
<p>&#8220;There are numerous examples of how the Administration misstated and manipulated the facts as it made the case for war.  Administration statements on Saddam&#8217;s alleged nuclear weapons capabilities and ties with Al Qaeda represent the best examples of how it consistently and repeatedly manipulated the facts.</p>
<p>&#8220;The American people were warned time and again by the President, the Vice President, and the current Secretary of State about Saddam&#8217;s nuclear weapons capabilities.  The Vice President said Iraq &#8220;has reconstituted its nuclear weapons.&#8221; Playing upon the fears of Americans after September 11, these officials and others raised the specter that, left unchecked, Saddam could soon attack America with nuclear weapons.</p>
<p>&#8220;Obviously we know now their nuclear claims were wholly inaccurate.  But more troubling is the fact that a lot of intelligence experts were telling the Administration then that its claims about Saddam&#8217;s nuclear capabilities were false. </p>
<p>&#8220;The situation was very similar with respect to Saddam&#8217;s links to Al Qaeda.  The Vice President told the American people, &#8220;We know he&#8217;s out trying once again to produce nuclear weapons and we know he has a longstanding relationship with various terrorist groups including the Al Qaeda organization.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The Administration&#8217;s assertions on this score have been totally discredited.  But again, the Administration went ahead with these assertions in spite of the fact that the government&#8217;s top experts did not agree with these claims. </p>
<p>&#8220;What has been the response of this Republican-controlled Congress to the Administration&#8217;s manipulation of intelligence that led to this protracted war in Iraq?  Basically nothing.   Did the Republican-controlled Congress carry out its constitutional obligations to conduct oversight?  No.  Did it support our troops and their families by providing them the answers to many important questions?  No.  Did it even attempt to force this Administration to answer the most basic questions about its behavior?  No.</p>
<p>&#8220;Unfortunately the unwillingness of the Republican-controlled Congress to exercise its oversight responsibilities is not limited to just Iraq.  We see it with respect to the prisoner abuse scandal.  We see it with respect to Katrina.  And we see it with respect to the cronyism and corruption that permeates this Administration.</p>
<p>&#8220;Time and time again, this Republican-controlled Congress has consistently chosen to put its political interests ahead of our national security.  They have repeatedly chosen to protect the Republican Administration rather than get to the bottom of what happened and why. </p>
<p>&#8220;There is also another disturbing pattern here, namely about how the Administration responded to those who challenged its assertions.  Time and again this Administration has actively sought to attack and undercut those who dared to raise questions about its preferred course.</p>
<p>&#8220;For example, when General Shinseki indicated several hundred thousand troops would be needed in Iraq, his military career came to an end.  When then OMB Director Larry Lindsay suggested the cost of this war would approach $200 billion, his career in the Administration came to an end.  When U.N. Chief Weapons Inspector Hans Blix challenged conclusions about Saddam&#8217;s WMD capabilities, the Administration pulled out his inspectors.  When Nobel Prize winner and IAEA head Mohammed el-Baridei raised questions about the Administration&#8217;s claims of Saddam&#8217;s nuclear capabilities, the Administration attempted to remove him from his post.  When Joe Wilson stated that there was no attempt by Saddam to acquire uranium from Niger, the Administration launched a vicious and coordinated campaign to demean and discredit him, going so far as to expose the fact that his wife worked as a CIA agent.</p>
<p>&#8220;Given this Administration&#8217;s pattern of squashing those who challenge its misstatements, what has been the response of this Republican-controlled Congress?  Again, absolutely nothing.  And with their inactions, they provide political cover for this Administration at the same time they keep the truth from our troops who continue to make large sacrifices in Iraq. </p>
<p>&#8220;This behavior is unacceptable.  The toll in Iraq is as staggering as it is solemn.  More than 2,000 Americans have lost their lives.  Over 90 Americans have paid the ultimate sacrifice this month alone â€“ the fourth deadliest month since the war began.  More than 15,000 have been wounded.  More than 150,000 remain in harm&#8217;s way.  Enormous sacrifices have been and continue to be made. </p>
<p>&#8220;The troops and the American people have a right to expect answers and accountability worthy of that sacrifice.  For example, 40 Senate Democrats wrote a substantive and detailed letter to the President asking four basic questions about the Administration&#8217;s Iraq policy and received a four sentence answer in response.  These Senators and the American people deserve better.   </p>
<p>&#8220;They also deserve a searching and comprehensive investigation about how the Bush Administration brought this country to war.  Key questions that need to be answered include:</p>
<p>    * How did the Bush Administration assemble its case for war against Iraq?<br />
    * Who did Bush Administration officials listen to and who did they ignore?<br />
    * How did senior Administration officials manipulate or manufacture intelligence presented to the Congress and the American people?<br />
    * What was the role of the White House Iraq Group or WHIG, a group of senior White House officials tasked with marketing the war and taking down its critics?<br />
    * How did the Administration coordinate its efforts to attack individuals who dared to challenge the Administration&#8217;s assertions?<br />
    * Why has the Administration failed to provide Congress with the documents that will shed light on their misconduct and misstatements?</p>
<p>&#8220;Unfortunately the Senate committee that should be taking the lead in providing these answers is not.  Despite the fact that the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee publicly committed to examine many of these questions more than 1 and Â½ years ago, he has chosen not to keep this commitment.  Despite the fact that he restated that commitment earlier this year on national television, he has still done nothing. </p>
<p>&#8220;At this point, we can only conclude he will continue to put politics ahead of our national security.  If he does anything at this point, I suspect he will play political games by producing an analysis that fails to answer any of these important questions.  Instead, if history is any guide, this analysis will attempt to disperse and deflect blame away from the Administration. </p>
<p>&#8220;We demand that the Intelligence Committee and other committees in this body with jurisdiction over these matters carry out a full and complete investigation immediately as called for by Democrats in the committee&#8217;s annual intelligence authorization report.  Our troops and the American people have sacrificed too much.  It is time this Republican-controlled Congress put the interests of the American people ahead of their own political interests.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/11/01/give-em-hell-harry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (request URI is rejected)

Served from: skaroff.com @ 2012-02-20 11:24:29 -->
