<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SkaroffBlog &#187; Republicans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/tag/republicans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skaroff.com/blog</link>
	<description>coming at you intermittently from the City of Brotherly Love</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:43:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pennsylvania Assembly Passes Minimum Wage Hike</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/04/07/penna-assembly-passes-minimum-wage-hike/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/04/07/penna-assembly-passes-minimum-wage-hike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 22:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PapaSkaroff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/04/07/penna-assembly-passes-minimum-wage-hike/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s good news from Harrisburg: In a lopsided 146-50 vote, Pennsylvania&#8217;s State Assembly passed HB 257, the long-stalled raise in the minimum wage. A large number of Republicans joined the solid Democrats on Wednesday to increase annual pay for the state&#8217;s lowest-wage workers by $4,000. Hourly pay would bump up to $6.15 starting July1 this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s good news from Harrisburg:  In a lopsided 146-50 vote, Pennsylvania&#8217;s State Assembly passed <a href="http://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/BI/BT/2005/0/HB0257P3872.HTM" title="HOUSE BILL 257">HB 257,</a> the long-stalled raise in the minimum wage.  A large number of Republicans joined the solid Democrats on Wednesday to increase annual pay for the state&#8217;s lowest-wage workers by $4,000.  Hourly pay would bump up to $6.15 starting July1 this year, and to $7.25 a year later, lifting thousands of families above the poverty line.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not law yet, however.  The State Senate still has to pass the bill before Gov. Rendell, an announced supporter of the wage increase, gets to sign it.  Be sure to remind <a href="http://www.pasen.gov/" title="Pennsylvania Senate. 'Find members by...' block">your State Senator</a> to help pass HB 257 when it comes up for a vote soon.</p>
<p>When enacted, the new rates would make Pennsylvania the <a href="http://www.fiscalpolicy.org/FPISmallBusinessMinWage.pdf" title="States with Minimum Wages above the Federal level... pg 3(pdf)">20th state to set its minimum wage above the federal level.</a></p>
<p><em>Young burger-flipper exception:</em>  The bill as passed allows employers to pay newly hired teenagers a &#8220;training wage&#8221; of $5.15/hr for two months.  And to protect the integrity of this exception, it forbids employers from firing regular employees just to substitute them with low-paid trainees.</p>
<p>Several Republican members of the Appropriations Committe who had voted against the bill in committee, switched and voted in favor of it when it reached the Assembly floor.  Shades of the Kerry campaign: They voted against the minimum wage, before they voted for it!</p>
<p>Companion legislation, a bill to set future automatic COLAs (cost-of-living adjustments), didn&#8217;t make it out of committee.  Without COLAs, expect the struggle to re-emerge in several years as inflation nibbles away at the new wage rates.</p>
<p><strong>Other legislative news:</strong>  As he had publicly pledged, Gov. Rendell last month vetoed the anti-voter bill.  Under that law, passed with strong Republican backing, Pennsylvania voters could be turned away at the polls if they failed to bring proper identification.  It would have replaced the current system in which voters sign a registry and have their signature compared to an older version already on file.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/04/07/penna-assembly-passes-minimum-wage-hike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Stall Penna. Minimum Wage Increase Again, 4th Time in 4 Weeks</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/03/11/republicans-stall-penna-minimum-wage-increase-again-4th-time-in-4-weeks/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/03/11/republicans-stall-penna-minimum-wage-increase-again-4th-time-in-4-weeks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 16:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PapaSkaroff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/03/11/republicans-stall-penna-minimum-wage-increase-again-4th-time-in-4-weeks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just back from the legislature&#8217;s February-March break, Pennsylvania&#8217;s Assembly Appropriations Committee unanamously approved sending the minimum wage bill (H.B. 2021) to the full House for a final vote. Then, after the Committee adjourned, Chairman Brett Feese pulled it back, using a maneuver to reconsider the bill. It&#8217;s now four consecutive legislative weeks that Committee Republicans [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just back from the legislature&#8217;s February-March break, Pennsylvania&#8217;s Assembly Appropriations Committee unanamously approved sending the <a href="http://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/BI/BT/2005/0/HB2021P3480.HTM" title="House Bill 2021 - Minimum Wage">minimum wage bill (H.B. 2021)</a> to the full House for a final vote.  Then, after the Committee adjourned, Chairman Brett Feese pulled it back, using a maneuver to reconsider the bill.  It&#8217;s now four consecutive legislative weeks that Committee Republicans have blocked a vote to raise the current pitiful minimum wage.</p>
<p>The Bill, sponsored by a whopping 87 Assemblymen, would help pull low-wage workers above the federal poverty level, raising the hourly rate to $6.25 this year and $7.15 in 2007, with annual cost-of-living raises thereafter.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pahouse.com/pr/Cohen/202030806.htm" title="Cohen says Republicans are running out of options to keep workers in poverty -- 3-8-06">Rep. Mark Cohen,</a> a leading advocate of the bill and House Democratic Caucus Chairman, says he expects the Dems will make motions to bring the legislation up again next week.  He calls Feese&#8217;s actions &#8211;moving to reconsider the bill and then accepting his own motion, all done after the Committee had adjourned&#8211; &#8220;an unprecedented parliamentary trick.&#8221;</p>
<p>Take action:<br />
â€¢ Contact Brett Feese (717-787-5270 <a href="mailto:repfeese@pahousegop.com" title="Appropriations Chair Rep. Brett Feese -- email">email</a>), urging him to report the bill to the full Assembly for a final vote.<br />
â€¢ Contact <a href="http://www.legis.state.pa.us/" title="PA General Assembly -- Find Members by...">your own State Assemblyman</a> to enlist support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/03/11/republicans-stall-penna-minimum-wage-increase-again-4th-time-in-4-weeks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Unknown&#8217; Candidate Pennacchio Shows Strength</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/03/09/unknown-candidate-pennacchio-shows-strength/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/03/09/unknown-candidate-pennacchio-shows-strength/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 04:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PapaSkaroff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santorum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/03/09/unknown-candidate-pennacchio-shows-strength/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here comes Pennacchio: At its annual endorsement meeting Saturday in preparation for this spring&#8217;s primary election, the Bucks County Democratic Committee reflected a growing recognition of progressive U.S. Senate candidate Chuck Pennacchio. Pennacchio, a Bucks resident whose name has been unknown to most Pennsylvanians, garnered a surprising 47% of the vote, nearly edging out major [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Here comes Pennacchio:</em>  At its annual endorsement meeting Saturday in preparation for this spring&#8217;s primary election, the <a href="http://www.bucksdemocrats.com/displaynews.asp?id=42" title="Bucks County Dems - 2006 Endorsements">Bucks County Democratic Committee</a> reflected a growing recognition of progressive U.S. Senate candidate <a href="http://chuck2006.com/" title="Chuck Pennacchio for United States Senate 2006">Chuck Pennacchio.</a>  Pennacchio, a Bucks resident whose name has been unknown to most Pennsylvanians, garnered a surprising 47% of the vote, nearly edging out major player and conservative candidate Bob Casey Jr. with 52%.</p>
<p>The winner of the May 16 primary will face NeoCon Rick Santorum in the general election next November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/03/09/unknown-candidate-pennacchio-shows-strength/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rendell: I&#8217;ll veto anti-voter bill</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/21/rendell-ill-veto-anti-voter-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/21/rendell-ill-veto-anti-voter-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 15:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PapaSkaroff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/?p=301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congratulations to Gov. Ed Rendell for standing up to the Republican-dominated state legislature in their attempt to limit voters&#8217; rights! In a speech at the National Constitution Center, the Governor announced yesterday he would veto the bill passed by the state legislature that would make voting more cumbersome by requiring every voter to show an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations to Gov. Ed Rendell for standing up to the Republican-dominated state legislature in their attempt to limit voters&#8217; rights!  In a speech at the National Constitution Center, the Governor announced yesterday he would veto the bill passed by the state legislature that would make voting more cumbersome by requiring every voter to show an ID.</p>
<p>According to the <a href="http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/news/13919119.htm" title="Rendell to veto bill that would require voter ID">AP report,</a></p>
<blockquote><p>He believes such a mandate is unconstitutional and would disenfranchise some of the state&#8217;s most vulnerable residents.  People including nursing home residents and poorer citizens might not have proper ID and thus could lose their right to vote under the legislation, Rendell said.</p>
<p>&#8220;At a time in our nation&#8217;s history when voter participation is dropping to alarming levels, the government should not be taking action that will turn away bona fide voters from our polls.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>This from the <a href="http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/13920986.htm" title="IDs at polls unnecessary, Rendell says">Philadelphia Inquirer:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Seated in front of a dozen of the city&#8217;s African American leaders, Democrats all, Rendell said at a news conference that House Bill 1318 would have the effect of denying some people their right to vote.</p>
<p>The legislation, he said, would discourage voting at a time when &#8220;we should be doing everything we can to increase voter participation.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Meanwhile, Lynn Swann, Rendell&#8217;s likely Republican opponent next election, seems worried that without the new law not enough Democrats will be turned away from the polls.  &#8220;The idea that presenting a form of identification would somehow disenfranchise people is as ridiculous as it is untrue,&#8221; his campaign dissembled.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.governor.state.pa.us/governor/cwp/view.asp?a=3&#038;q=445630" title="Governor: HB 1318 Veto Letters">governor&#8217;s website</a> lists 22 organizations urging a veto of House Bill 1318.  <em>Still to come:</em>  Even though passed by the legislature last Wednesday, the bill has yet to cross the governor&#8217;s desk allowing his formal veto.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/21/rendell-ill-veto-anti-voter-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roadblocks at the Ballot Box:  Legislature Passes Pennsylvania Anti-Voting Rights Act</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/17/roadblocks-at-the-ballot-box-legislature-passes-pennsylvania-anti-voting-rights-act/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/17/roadblocks-at-the-ballot-box-legislature-passes-pennsylvania-anti-voting-rights-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PapaSkaroff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/17/roadblocks-at-the-ballot-box-legislature-passes-pennsylvania-anti-voting-rights-act/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember the first time you voted and had to show your ID? There&#8217;s new legislation requiring voters to remember to bring proper ID at every election. The state Senate and Assembly passed House Bill 1318 on party-line votesâ€“ with Republicans in favor of cracking down on teens who haven&#8217;t gotten drivers&#8217; licenses, little old ladies [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember the first time you voted and had to show your ID?  There&#8217;s new legislation requiring voters to remember to bring proper ID at <em>every </em>election. The state Senate and Assembly passed <a href="http://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/BI/BT/2005/0/HB1318P3587.HTM" title="H.B. 1318">House Bill 1318</a> on party-line votesâ€“ with Republicans in favor of cracking down on teens who haven&#8217;t gotten drivers&#8217; licenses, little old ladies with wallets left at home on their dressers, renters and low-income folks who don&#8217;t get utilities bills; and with Democrats willing to let just any ol&#8217; registered voter actually cast a ballot.</p>
<p>The legislation, if signed by Gov. Ed Rendell, will make for longer, slower lines at the polls.  Expect angry scenes as voters, accustomed to the current convenience of the matching-signature rule, get turned away due to the new technicalities.  Y&#8217;know, voting&#8217;s becoming too much of a hassle.  I&#8217;m gonna just stay home.  Tuesday nights &#8230; American Idol&#8217;s on at 8.</p>
<p>Or maybe I&#8217;ll tell the Governor that erecting barriers to voting is bad law, and he should veto H.B. 1318.  These two sites have lists of ways to contact him: <a href="http://www.governor.state.pa.us/governor/cwp/view.asp?a=1117&#038;q=437853&#038;governorNav=" title="Contact the Governor">first</a> and <a href="http://www.governor.state.pa.us/governor/cwp/view.asp?a=1109&#038;q=442340" title="Governor: Regional Offices">second</a>.</p>
<p>State Rep. Babette Josephs of Philadelphia is a vocal critic of the bill, for both the damage it will do as well as the needed electoral reforms is fails to address.  <a href="http://www.pahouse.com/pr/Josephs/182021506.htm" title="Josephs to governor: 'Veto H.B. 1318, the anti-voting rights act'">She says,</a>  </p>
<blockquote><p>I am working on real problems that have occurred in recent elections: unworkable statutory deadlines which led to military ballots being received too late to be counted; long lines at polling places; widespread intimidation of minority voters; coordinated efforts to mislead voters as to the date of the election or the location of polling places, and phony voter registration drives where registrations of one party were discarded.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/17/roadblocks-at-the-ballot-box-legislature-passes-pennsylvania-anti-voting-rights-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Penna. Republicans Block Vote to Raise State Minimum Wage&#8211; 3rd Time in a Month</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/15/pa-state-house-republicans-block-vote-to-raise-minimum-wage-3rd-time-in-a-month-2/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/15/pa-state-house-republicans-block-vote-to-raise-minimum-wage-3rd-time-in-a-month-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PapaSkaroff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/15/pa-state-house-republicans-block-vote-to-raise-minimum-wage-3rd-time-in-a-month-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a Valentine present to Pennsylvania&#8217;s low-wage employers, the Republican majority in the State Assembly yesterday voted for the third time in as many weeks to block a Democratic-backed bill to raise the minimum wage. The vote came just as the Assembly started its break for the rest of the month. The new rate, a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a Valentine present to Pennsylvania&#8217;s low-wage employers, the Republican majority in the State Assembly yesterday voted for the third time in as many weeks to block a Democratic-backed bill to raise the minimum wage.  The vote came just as the Assembly started its break for the rest of the month.</p>
<p>The new rate, a pitiful $7.15/hr, is a substantial hike from the current $5.15 and is in line with new rates in <a href="http://www.dol.gov/esa/minwage/america.htm" title="US Dept. of Labor - Minimum Wage by State">New York and New Jersey</a>.  Blocking the bill from consideration is a way for the Republicans to maintain the current wage rate without members actually going on record as voting against the hike.</p>
<p>Two House Republicans defected from their party by voting in favor of considering the bill.  In a message to supporters, Democratic House leaders Mike Veon and Mark Cohen say they see this move as a small but significant change; only ten more defectors will give the Dems the majority they need to finally bring the bill to an up-or-down vote.  A number of Republicans have quietly assured constituents that they support the wage hike.</p>
<p>What you can do to help:</p>
<p>â€¢ Call your Republican Assemblyperson and urge their support for the (barely) livable new wage rate.</p>
<p>â€¢ If you&#8217;re in a Democratic district, you can contact Republican <a href="mailto:repfeese@pahousegop.com" title="Rep. Brett Feese, PA Appropriations Committee Chair">Rep. Brett Feese,</a> chair of the Appropriations Committee, urging a floor vote.</p>
<p>Not sure who your Assemblyperson is?  Use the <a href="http://www.legis.state.pa.us/" title="Search for Your Assemblyman">&#8220;Find Members By&#8221; search block</a> at the Pennsylvania General Assembly  home page.</p>
<p>Rep. Mark Cohen, sponsor of the bill, is the son of recently deceased Philadelphia City Councilman-at-Large David Cohen, a long-time supporter of workers&#8217; issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/15/pa-state-house-republicans-block-vote-to-raise-minimum-wage-3rd-time-in-a-month-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Run for Office in Philly This Spring</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/01/27/run-for-office-in-philly-this-spring/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/01/27/run-for-office-in-philly-this-spring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 20:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PapaSkaroff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/01/27/run-for-office-in-philly-this-spring/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interested in local politics and community service? Are you ready to go beyond merely complaining about the system? A good place to start in Philadelphia is the position of Ward Committee Member&#8211; no experience is required, and there are almost 7,000 openings! Here&#8217;s how it works: The City has 66 Wards which are divided into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interested in local politics and community service?  Are you ready to go beyond merely complaining about the system?</p>
<p>A good place to start in Philadelphia is the position of Ward Committee Member&#8211; no experience is required, and there are almost 7,000 openings!</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how it works:  The City has 66 Wards which are divided into a total of 1681 <em>Divisions</em>&#8211; what are often called Precincts in other jurisdictions.  Your Division is your immediate neighborhood.  Each Division has just a single polling place (sometimes shared with neighboring Divisions), and the Democrats and Republicans can each have two Committee Members serving a few hundred voters registered in the party.</p>
<p>Committee Members actively support party causes and candidates for higher offices.  They&#8217;re the link between the neighborhood and the larger political world and have some say in selecting local party leadership.  Committee Members often help neighbors interact with City bureaucracies&#8211; it&#8217;s the essence of retail politics.</p>
<p>All Committee Members are chosen in the May Primary.  To run, you must be 18+ and registered in the party. You&#8217;ll need signatures of 10 supporters (call 215-686-3460 for forms), collected between Valentine&#8217;s Day and March 7.  Now&#8217;s the time to get moving.  Make a difference!</p>
<p>Other offices up for grabs this spring:  State Committee Member (100 signatures required) and State Assembly Representative (300).  Call 717-787-5280 for forms.</p>
<p>No vacancies?  Note that none of the current State Assemblymen from Philadelphia have said that they <em>won&#8217;t</em> be running again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/01/27/run-for-office-in-philly-this-spring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prescription Debacle</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/01/20/prescription-debacle/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/01/20/prescription-debacle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeLay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/?p=293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes, just when you think the levels of incompetency, corruption, and near-criminality in the BushCo administration can&#8217;t get any worse, they up the ante and pull another one out of their bag of crap. Krugman, via Atrios (who reposted the entire thing &#8220;for educational purposes&#8221;): The new prescription drug benefit is off to a catastrophic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes, just when you think the levels of incompetency, corruption, and near-criminality in the BushCo administration can&#8217;t get any worse, they up the ante and pull another one out of their bag of crap.  <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/2006/01/20/opinion/20krugman.html?hp" title="The K Street Prescription">Krugman</a>, via Atrios (who <a href="http://atrios.blogspot.com/2006_01_15_atrios_archive.html#113773244486131682" title="Eschaton">reposted the entire thing &#8220;for educational purposes&#8221;</a>):</p>
<blockquote><p>The new prescription drug benefit is off to a catastrophic start. Tens of thousands of older Americans have arrived at pharmacies to discover that their old drug benefits have been canceled, but that they aren&#8217;t on the list for the new program. More than two dozen states have taken emergency action.</p>
<p>At first, federal officials were oblivious. &#8220;This is going very well,&#8221; a Medicare spokesman declared a few days into the disaster. Then officials started making excuses. Some conservatives even insist that the debacle vindicates their ideology: see, government can&#8217;t do anything right.</p>
<p>But government works when it&#8217;s run by people who take public policy seriously. As Jonathan Cohn points out in The New Republic, when Medicare began 40 years ago, things went remarkably smoothly from the start. But this time the people putting together a new federal program had one foot out the revolving door: this was a drug bill written by and for lobbyists.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Mr. Scully had good reasons not to let anything stand in the way of the drug bill. He had received a special ethics waiver from his superiors allowing him to negotiate for future jobs with lobbying and investment firms &#8211; firms that had a strong financial stake in the form of the bill &#8211; while still in public office. He left public service, if that&#8217;s what it was, almost as soon as the bill was passed, and is once again a lobbyist, now for drug companies.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Representative Billy Tauzin, the bill&#8217;s point man on Capitol Hill, quickly left Congress once the bill was passed to become president of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, the powerful drug industry lobby.</p></blockquote>
<p>Go read the entire thing over at Eschaton.  Krugman wonderfully ties together the threads of this debacle and the political machine that is at the center of the Abramoff and Delay scandals.  He concludes with an important question.</p>
<blockquote><p>So I have a question for my colleagues in the news media: <strong>Why isn&#8217;t the decision by the White House to stonewall on the largest corruption scandal since Warren Harding considered major news?</strong></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/01/20/prescription-debacle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ethically challenged Santorum to craft lobbying reform bill</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/01/17/ethically-challenged-sen-santorum-set-to-craft-new-lobbying-reform-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/01/17/ethically-challenged-sen-santorum-set-to-craft-new-lobbying-reform-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PapaSkaroff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeLay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santorum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a cynical act of political theater, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist has picked Pennsylvania&#8217;s Rick Santorum to craft new ethics and lobbying legislation, according to a mass email from the Bob Casey Senate campaign. &#8220;Not only has Rick Santorum accepted more money from lobbyists than any other senator this election cycle, he is also [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a cynical act of political theater, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist has picked Pennsylvania&#8217;s Rick Santorum to craft new ethics and lobbying legislation, according to a mass email from the Bob Casey Senate campaign.</p>
<p>&#8220;Not only has Rick Santorum accepted more money from lobbyists than any other senator this election cycle, he is also the leader of the notorious K Street Project,&#8221; wrote Jay Reiff, Campaign Manager for Casey.</p>
<p>The K Street Project is the nefarious Tom Delay/Jack Abramoff plan to place &#8220;their hand picked Republican friends into the very lobbying firms that Santorum is now being asked to regulate.  The K Street Project and Santorum&#8217;s selection to lead ethics reform are indicative of an arrogance of power in Washington that needs to change.&#8221;</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the Casey people have mounted a <a href="http://forms.bobcaseyforpa.com/stepaside/?sc=0006" title="Petition to Frist: No on Santorum for Ethics">petition drive</a> against the selection of Santorum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/01/17/ethically-challenged-sen-santorum-set-to-craft-new-lobbying-reform-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Well my house will be cold this winter</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/10/07/well-my-house-will-be-cold-this-winter/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/10/07/well-my-house-will-be-cold-this-winter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 23:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/?p=218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rich get richer and the poor will be freezing to death. I wish this was surprising. I wish this still made me angry. I wish things were different, but this is George Bush&#8217;s America we live in and there&#8217;s only one thing the Republican leadership cares about: fealty to their corporate overlords. The AP [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rich get richer and the poor will be freezing to death.</p>
<p>I wish this was surprising.  I wish this still made me angry.  I wish things were different, but this is George Bush&#8217;s America we live in and there&#8217;s only one thing the Republican leadership cares about: fealty to their corporate overlords.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/business/AP-Katrina-Energy.html?hp&#038;ex=1128744000&#038;en=6cca6da1125a8810&#038;ei=5094&#038;partner=homepage" title="House Narrowly Approves Bill to Boost Refineries, 212-210">AP says</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The House voted to encourage U.S. oil companies to build new refineries Friday in a raucous roll call that Republican leaders extended 40 minutes while they buttonholed their own members to avoid an embarrassing defeat.</p>
<p>Democrats crying &#8221;shame, shame&#8221; &#8212; and some GOP moderates &#8212; called the bill a sop to rich oil companies that would do nothing to ease energy costs including expected soaring heating bills this winter.</p></blockquote>
<p>ThinkProgress <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/07/house-block-vote/" title="Think Progress Â» Right-Wing House Twists Arms, Thwarts Democracy To Pass Oil Industy Windfall">has the video</a>.  I&#8217;m not a big Pelosi fan, but she&#8217;s been handling things well recently.</p>
<p>I know some of you are probably tired of the recent trend of all politics all the time here.  So here are some links that I check out when I&#8217;m trying to get away from the pain of reality.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/sports/columnists/phil_sheridan/qa_forum.htm" title="Forum">Phil Sheridan&#8217;s Q&#038;A Forum</a></li>
<li><a href="http://del.icio.us/popular/" title="del.icio.us/popular">del.icio.us/popular</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/" title="Gizmodo">Gizmodo</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.memepool.com/" title="Memepool.com">memepool.com</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/10/07/well-my-house-will-be-cold-this-winter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (request URI is rejected)

Served from: skaroff.com @ 2012-02-20 11:25:41 -->
