<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SkaroffBlog &#187; Santorum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/tag/santorum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skaroff.com/blog</link>
	<description>coming at you intermittently from the City of Brotherly Love</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:43:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Unknown&#8217; Candidate Pennacchio Shows Strength</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/03/09/unknown-candidate-pennacchio-shows-strength/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/03/09/unknown-candidate-pennacchio-shows-strength/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 04:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PapaSkaroff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santorum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/03/09/unknown-candidate-pennacchio-shows-strength/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here comes Pennacchio: At its annual endorsement meeting Saturday in preparation for this spring&#8217;s primary election, the Bucks County Democratic Committee reflected a growing recognition of progressive U.S. Senate candidate Chuck Pennacchio. Pennacchio, a Bucks resident whose name has been unknown to most Pennsylvanians, garnered a surprising 47% of the vote, nearly edging out major [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Here comes Pennacchio:</em>  At its annual endorsement meeting Saturday in preparation for this spring&#8217;s primary election, the <a href="http://www.bucksdemocrats.com/displaynews.asp?id=42" title="Bucks County Dems - 2006 Endorsements">Bucks County Democratic Committee</a> reflected a growing recognition of progressive U.S. Senate candidate <a href="http://chuck2006.com/" title="Chuck Pennacchio for United States Senate 2006">Chuck Pennacchio.</a>  Pennacchio, a Bucks resident whose name has been unknown to most Pennsylvanians, garnered a surprising 47% of the vote, nearly edging out major player and conservative candidate Bob Casey Jr. with 52%.</p>
<p>The winner of the May 16 primary will face NeoCon Rick Santorum in the general election next November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/03/09/unknown-candidate-pennacchio-shows-strength/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ethically challenged Santorum to craft lobbying reform bill</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/01/17/ethically-challenged-sen-santorum-set-to-craft-new-lobbying-reform-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/01/17/ethically-challenged-sen-santorum-set-to-craft-new-lobbying-reform-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PapaSkaroff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeLay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santorum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a cynical act of political theater, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist has picked Pennsylvania&#8217;s Rick Santorum to craft new ethics and lobbying legislation, according to a mass email from the Bob Casey Senate campaign. &#8220;Not only has Rick Santorum accepted more money from lobbyists than any other senator this election cycle, he is also [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a cynical act of political theater, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist has picked Pennsylvania&#8217;s Rick Santorum to craft new ethics and lobbying legislation, according to a mass email from the Bob Casey Senate campaign.</p>
<p>&#8220;Not only has Rick Santorum accepted more money from lobbyists than any other senator this election cycle, he is also the leader of the notorious K Street Project,&#8221; wrote Jay Reiff, Campaign Manager for Casey.</p>
<p>The K Street Project is the nefarious Tom Delay/Jack Abramoff plan to place &#8220;their hand picked Republican friends into the very lobbying firms that Santorum is now being asked to regulate.  The K Street Project and Santorum&#8217;s selection to lead ethics reform are indicative of an arrogance of power in Washington that needs to change.&#8221;</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the Casey people have mounted a <a href="http://forms.bobcaseyforpa.com/stepaside/?sc=0006" title="Petition to Frist: No on Santorum for Ethics">petition drive</a> against the selection of Santorum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2006/01/17/ethically-challenged-sen-santorum-set-to-craft-new-lobbying-reform-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bloched Bid</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/11/23/bloched-bid/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/11/23/bloched-bid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 21:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Milakofsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eagles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/?p=263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[â€œBloched Bidâ€? Arbitrator Richard Bloch ruled today in favor of the punishment handed down to outspoken and maligned wide receiver Terrell Owens by the Philadelphia Eagles. Let me just say that I am SHOCKED. I did not think there was any way that the suspension would be upheld. There was every indication from insiders and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://skaroff.com/blog/img/adam_milakofsky.jpg" alt="Adam Milakofsky" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5"/>â€œ<strong>Bloched Bid</strong>â€?</p>
<p>Arbitrator Richard Bloch ruled today in favor of the punishment handed down to outspoken and maligned wide receiver Terrell Owens by the Philadelphia Eagles.  </p>
<p>Let me just say that I am SHOCKED.  I did not think there was any way that the suspension would be upheld.  There was every indication from insiders and experts on the matter that the suspension would be reduced.  Moreover, sources familiar with Eagles management believed that the front office didnâ€™t have the stomach for another grievance.  These folks indicated that if another grievance was brought by the NFLPA, this time in regards to Owensâ€™ deactivation as a means of suspension, the Eagles would simply release T.O.</p>
<p>But for now all of those thoughts are for naught.  Bloch not only upheld the suspension, but also the Eagles right to suspend T.O. &#8220;due to the nature of his conduct and its destructive and continuing threat to the team.&#8221; </p>
<p>I am THRILLED.  T.O. got exactly what he deserved.  He was relentless with his verbal attacks on the team, Coach Reid and Donovan.  Pushing the limits with his words and his antics, T.O. dug his own grave.  He will now pay for his poor judgment with the loss of his salary for four games, a portion of his signing bonus and the remaining 5 years and $35+ million on his contract.  Moreover, he has tarnished his image, jeopardizing his chances of finding his way onto a Super Bowl-bound team.  Moreover, he may have created a Michael Irvin-esque roadblock toward his bid for Canton.  </p>
<p>T.O. approval ratings have actually dipped below that of Ricky Santorum.  His actions were a disgrace to himself and the NFL.  Now he can spend some time to think about the past six months while chilling on his couch watching the rest of the season on TV.  Have fun budâ€¦now you have plenty of time to hang with your boy Drew.</p>
<p>On another note, the Eagles finally rid themselves of the Jose Cortez and Reggie Hodges experimentâ€¦.ummm, what took so long?</p>
<p>In other Philadelphia sports news, Jim Thome is on his way back to the Midwest, as the Phillies have dealt him to the reigning World Series Champions for center fielder Aaron Rowandâ€¦.more on this trade later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/11/23/bloched-bid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ricky Don&#8217;t Lose That Number</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/11/16/ricky-dont-lose-that-number/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/11/16/ricky-dont-lose-that-number/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 22:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santorum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/?p=258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Things just keep getting worse for our buddy, Radical Ricky &#8220;Santorum&#8221; Santorum. On Monday Hotline reported that the current Senator has challenged the presumptive Democratic nominee, Bobby Casey Jr. to a debate. Why this challenge has been made a year out, and by the incumbent nonetheless is a mystery. Meanwhile this week&#8217;s Strategic Vision poll [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things just keep getting worse for our buddy, Radical Ricky &#8220;Santorum&#8221; Santorum.  On Monday <a href="http://hotlineblog.nationaljournal.com/archives/2005/11/post_1.html" title="Hotline On Call: Santorum Challenges Casey To Debates">Hotline reported</a> that the current Senator has challenged the presumptive Democratic nominee, Bobby Casey Jr. to a debate.  Why this challenge has been made a year out, and by the incumbent nonetheless is a mystery.  </p>
<p>Meanwhile this week&#8217;s <a href="http://www.strategicvision.biz/political/pa_poll_1116.htm" title="Strategic Vision poll">Strategic Vision poll</a> has Santorum trailing Casey by 15 points and facing a mere 38% approval rating.  Perhaps it&#8217;s because his right wing fundamentalist supporters are angry at him for admitting that &#8220;intelligent design&#8221; is a load of crap?  On Saturday <a href="http://www.pandagon.net/archives/2005/11/little_ricky_no.html" title="Little Ricky: no 'intelligent design' in schools">he told the Beaver County Times</a> that ID shouldn&#8217;t be taught in schools and that &#8220;Science leads you where it leads you.&#8221;  Problem is he heartily endorsed it two years ago in the Washington Times.</p>
<p>Yeah, Ricky isn&#8217;t just a wacko right winger, he&#8217;s also plain stupid.  To think just a few years ago he was a shining star in the Republican party. [UPDATE: All Spin Zones points out that Santorum was a fan of intelligent design <a href="http://allspinzone.com/blog/index.php?itemid=1692" title="Flip Flopping Santorum">only 10 months ago</a>!]</p>
<p>Amidst all this conservative foundering it&#8217;s easy to forget that there is a Democratic primary, and while the party bosses (Rendell, Reid, Schumer) have picked out good ol&#8217; Casey, there is a truly committed progressive running in the race.   <a href="http://www.chuck2006.com/facts.asp" title="Chuck Pennacchio for United States Senate 2006">Chuck Pennacchio</a> is against the war, for universal healthcare, and believes in both abortion rights and worker&#8217;s rights.  The more I learn about him, the more I like.  He&#8217;s got a <a href="http://www.chuck2006.com/warwick.asp" title="Warwick Hotel, December 8th">fundraiser at the Warwick Hotel</a> on December 8th if you&#8217;re interested in more than the status quo.  Also check out <a href="http://dragonballyee.blogs.com/" title="philly">Dragonballyee</a> where Albert&#8217;s been doing a great job blogging about Chuck and pushing him as a candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/11/16/ricky-dont-lose-that-number/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Celebrate We Will</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/09/28/celebrate-we-will/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/09/28/celebrate-we-will/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeLay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House Majority Leader Tom Delay HAS BEEN INDICTED ON ONE COUNT OF CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY BY A TEXAS GRAND JURY. Under House rules, this means Delay has to step-down as Majority Leader. Radical Rick Santorum, get off your cell phone, we&#8217;re coming for you next baby. Good work, everyone.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>House Majority Leader Tom Delay <a href="http://nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-DeLay-Investigation.html?hp&#038;ex=1127966400&#038;en=2cf6902ed6f45124&#038;ei=5094&#038;partner=homepage" title="">HAS BEEN INDICTED ON ONE COUNT OF CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY BY A TEXAS GRAND JURY</a>.  </strong></p>
<p>Under House rules, this means Delay has to step-down as Majority Leader.  </p>
<p>Radical Rick Santorum, get off your cell phone, we&#8217;re coming for you next baby.<br />
<a href="http://skaroff.com/blog/?pp_album=1&#038;pp_image=1426927_523b68d33a_n_01.jpg" title="1426927 523b68d33a n 01" target="_top"><img src="http://skaroff.com/blog/wp-content/photos/1426927_523b68d33a_n_01.jpg" width="230" height="194" alt="1426927 523b68d33a n 01" class="centered" /></a></p>
<p>Good work, everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/09/28/celebrate-we-will/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Santorum&#8217;s Plan For Iraq&#8230;MORE OF THE SAME</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/08/10/santorums-plan-for-iraqmore-of-the-same/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/08/10/santorums-plan-for-iraqmore-of-the-same/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PeterS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/?p=153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rick Santorum, United States Senator from Pennsylvania and resident fanatical right-wing nut-job just doesn&#8217;t get it. In fact, the Republican Party just doesn&#8217;t get it. They have absolutely lost their footing on reality and they have no plans at all when it comes to the war in Iraq or the a global struggle against violent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick Santorum, United States Senator from Pennsylvania and resident fanatical right-wing nut-job just doesn&#8217;t get it. In fact, the Republican Party just doesn&#8217;t get it. They have absolutely lost their footing on reality and they have no plans at all when it comes to the war in Iraq or the a global struggle against violent extremism.</p>
<p>WJAC Channel 6 in PA ran a <a href="http://www.wjactv.com/news/4830325/detail.html" title="Santorum's Iraq comments">brief story</a> highlighting Santorum&#8217;s comments on the Iraq War. </p>
<blockquote><p>As violence in Iraq continues, there are mixed messages from Washington about how long troops will be deployed. Support is mixed among Americans. Recent polls show that support for the President&#8217;s Iraq policy has started to dip below 40-percent.</p>
<p>Senator Rick Santorum says we have to carry on, although casualties continue to mount. That&#8217;s a concern, but the bottom line is that we have to finish this war in a way that would make that sacrifice a worthy sacrifice.</p>
<p>The number of troops from <strong>Pennsylvania killed in Iraq is closing in on 90</strong>. </p></blockquote>
<p>Forget the electoral ramifications of the situation and the dwindling public support. Think about the troops who are deployed over there and think about the families who are living in constant fear of losing their sons or daughters. If the Republican Party <strong>really</strong> supported the troops, then they would make a plan to bring them home. Comments like, &#8220;we have to finish this war in a way that would make that sacrifice a worthy sacrifice&#8221; just doesn&#8217;t cut it anymore.</p>
<p>Where is the leadership&#8230;on vacation???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/08/10/santorums-plan-for-iraqmore-of-the-same/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Radical Rick: A Frothy Mixture?!</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/08/01/frothy-mixture/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/08/01/frothy-mixture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 22:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santorum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To piggyback on Peter&#8217;s post&#8211; It&#8217;s critical to understand what the Radical Rick Santorum strategy is all about. Do I think Radical Rick is purposely trying to lose the 2006 election? No, absolutely not. Radical Rick Santorum, despite his nonsensical rhetoric and his obvious stupidity, is a political animal just like every member of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To piggyback on Peter&#8217;s post&#8211; It&#8217;s critical to understand what the Radical Rick Santorum strategy is all about.  Do I think Radical Rick is purposely trying to lose the 2006 election?  No, absolutely not.  Radical Rick Santorum, despite his nonsensical rhetoric and his obvious stupidity, is a political animal just like every member of the U.S. Senate and he knows what he&#8217;s doing.  </p>
<p>And the political reality of Radical Rick&#8217;s position is that no matter what questions talk show hosts or his opponents throw at him about his out of the mainstream positions on issues&#8211; the bottom line is he believes (or at least is in a position to claim that he does) what he believes and is resolute in those beliefs.</p>
<p>Hey, do you remember the 2004 election between John Kerry and George Bush?  Well, more Americans disagreed with Bush&#8217;s positions on various issues (most notably the war in Iraq, handling of the economy, etc.) and and thankfully those same voters voted against Bush in November 2004 and Kerry won!!</p>
<p>Wait, ok&#8211; no.  The very same folks who were <strong><em>against</em></strong> Bush&#8217;s policies went to their respective polling stations and voted for him.  They felt that while Bush didn&#8217;t necessarily believe what they believe&#8211; he did BELIEVE IT STRONGLY.  </p>
<p>Now, we know that Bush believes very little of what he says and is just a really great politician.  And, I feel that Radical Rick is in a similar position today.  </p>
<p>My advice: watch out!  Early polls show that Radical Rick is trailing to Mr. Casey and that&#8217;s a good sign.  However, as Radical Rick moves quickly towards to the center and away from his radical roots&#8211; people will view him (because, well, people ain&#8217;t smart) as a moderate guy who isn&#8217;t afraid to preach his beliefs and stand by them.</p>
<p>The moral of this story: the average American doesn&#8217;t care what politicians believe.  All they care is that they believe in <em>something</em> and are willing to fight for those beliefs.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m a proud Democrat and I expect great things from Bob Casey.  But let&#8217;s just all be clear that Radical Rick is in this race to win and his strategy to say whatever he feels, however dangerous or destructive, has been and will continue to be a winning strategy for Republicans.</p>
<p>Thank you for not interrupting my rant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/08/01/frothy-mixture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Santorum Trying to Lose?</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/08/01/is-santorum-trying-to-oose/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/08/01/is-santorum-trying-to-oose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 18:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PeterS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santorum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/?p=140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Philadelphia Daily News did an interesting story on Rick Santorum&#8217;s (R-PA) campaign for re-election. Larry Sabato, a University of Virginia professor and expert on presidential politics makes the argument that Santorum may be trying to lose the campaign in order to cement his standing with the national conservative movement. We are still more than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Philadelphia Daily News did an interesting <a href="http://www.philly.com/mld/dailynews/news/local/12273498.htm" title="Santorum is confounding the pundits">story</a> on Rick Santorum&#8217;s (R-PA) campaign for re-election. <a href="http://www.centerforpolitics.org/about/staff_sabato.htm" title="Sabato BIO">Larry Sabato</a>,  a University of Virginia professor and expert on presidential politics makes the argument that Santorum may be trying to lose the campaign in order to cement his standing with the national conservative movement.  </p>
<p>We are still more than a year out from this crucial election, Santorum has plenty of time to add to his attention-grabbing, out of the mainstream, sometimes hilarious <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2003/04/22/national1737EDT0668.DTL" title="Santorum interview">statements</a>. SkaroffBlog will continue to update you on this race and will offer analysis as strategies and campaign tactics emerge.</p>
<p><strong><em>UPDATE: Santorum Trails Casey by 11 Points</em></strong>&#8212;In the race for Senate, a new Strategic Vision poll (R) finds Pennsylvania Treasurer Bob Casey (D) way ahead of Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA), 51% to 40%. (thanks to <a href="http://www.politicalwire.com" title="Taegan Goddard's Political Wire">Politicalwire.com</a> for the polling data)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/08/01/is-santorum-trying-to-oose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rope that Dope</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/07/14/rope-that-dope/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/07/14/rope-that-dope/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakesg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santorum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/07/14/rope-that-dope/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rick Santorum is digging his own grave. He continues to help his opponent Bob Casey Jr. by donating fodder to fuel the fire. The latest, dumbest thing to come out of his mouth, he actually wrote in 2002. And in this corner, my own Senator Ted Kennedy, has put it back in the headlines. Kennedy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick Santorum is digging his own grave. He continues to help his opponent Bob Casey Jr. by donating fodder to fuel the fire. The latest, dumbest thing to come out of his mouth, he actually wrote in 2002. And in this corner, my own Senator Ted Kennedy, has put it back in the headlines. Kennedy yesterday on the senate floor<a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2005/07/14/kennedy_rips_santorum_comments/" title="Kennedy rips Santorum"> called Santorum </a>&#8220;self rightous and insensitive&#8221; for his remarks  stating that the liberals who promote an alternative lifestyle in Massachusetts have spawned immoral behavior such as priests molesting children. And BAM, just like that, the knockout punch. Pennsylvania hosts the second largest population of elderly in this country after Florida, and with <a href="http://www.grassrootspa.com/2005/02/santorums-2006-reelection-referendum.html" title="Santorum Campaigning">Santorum campaigning </a>for Bush&#8217;s Social (In)security Plan, it&#8217;s unlikely that PA will want to keep that fool in office much longer. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/07/14/rope-that-dope/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foot, meet mouth</title>
		<link>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/05/20/foot-meet-mouth/</link>
		<comments>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/05/20/foot-meet-mouth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santorum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skaroff.com/wordpress/?p=35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is getting talked about like crazy out there, but I&#8217;ll jump in and make sure everyone knows exactly what our our wonderful junior Senator from Pennsylvania, Rick &#8220;Santorum&#8221; Santorum said on the floor of the US Congress yesterday: &#8220;What the Democrats are doing is the equivalent of Adolf Hitler in 1942 saying, &#8216;I&#8217;m in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://politicalwire.com/archives/2005/05/19/quote_of_the_day.html">This</a> <a href="http://atrios.blogspot.com/2005_05_15_atrios_archive.html#111653722869906084">is</a> <a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2005_05_15.php#005715">getting</a> <a href="http://www.davidsirota.com/2005/05/gop-offensively-invokes-nazisagain.html">talked</a> <a href="http://www.mydd.com/story/2005/5/19/173623/187">about</a> <a href="http://allspinzone.com/blog/index.php?itemid=325">like</a> <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/goldberg/goldberg090403.asp">crazy</a> <a href="http://talkleft.com/new_archives/010767.html">out</a> <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/index.php?p=925">there</a>, but I&#8217;ll jump in and make sure everyone knows exactly what our our wonderful junior Senator from Pennsylvania, Rick &#8220;<a href="http://www.spreadingsantorum.com/">Santorum</a>&#8221; Santorum <a href="http://rawstory.com/exclusives/byrne/santorum_hitler_519">said</a> on the floor of the US Congress yesterday:<br />
<blockquote>&#8220;What the Democrats are doing is the equivalent of Adolf Hitler in 1942 saying, &#8216;I&#8217;m in Paris. How dare you invade me. How dare you bomb my city? It&#8217;s mine.&#8217; This is no more the rule of the senate than it was the rule of the senate before not to filibuster.&#8221;<br /> <a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/05/19.html#a3012">Video</a>. <a href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/audio/santorum-hitler.mp3">Audio</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.chuck2006.com/">Chuck Pennacchio</a>, who is running against Casey Jr. in the Democratic party to face Santorum in &#8217;06 <a href="http://www.chuck2006.com/blogDetail.asp?id=140">responded</a>.<br />
<blockquote>â€œAs an historian of Holocaust-era Germany, I find Rick Santorumâ€™s comment to be offensive, divisive, and destructive. Rick Santorum should immediately issue a public apology, and then retreat with conscience to consider the lasting damage he has done to the United States Senate and to the memory of 12 million Holocaust victims.</p>
<p>â€œHow ironic is it that he would make such an extremist comment, comparing Senate Democrats to Adolph Hitler, while his own political party seeks to consolidate all governmental power in its own hands?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>This SHOULD be a story.  Let&#8217;s see what the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mainstream_media">MSM</a> does with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skaroff.com/blog/index.php/2005/05/20/foot-meet-mouth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.oliverwillis.com/audio/santorum-hitler.mp3" length="496300" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (request URI is rejected)

Served from: skaroff.com @ 2012-02-20 11:23:48 -->
